2:26-cv-04713 HUERTA v. FLINT GROUP PACKAGING INKS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION et al
Proof of Service (subsequent documents) ( 3
GAUFF v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC et al is a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court. The case is currently pending and has not been assigned to a specific judge. The lawsuit is related to a product liability claim and the exact nature of the claims is not publicly available.
Latest development
Order · April 26, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04713 HUERTA v. FLINT GROUP PACKAGING INKS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION et al
Other · May 01, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
4 Defendants
8 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Mead Johnson & Company, LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
GAUFF v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-04713.
The main identified defendant or respondent is FLINT GROUP PACKAGING INKS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC. The case is currently organized around Product liability, Mead Johnson & Company.
MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC et al is a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court. The case is currently pending and has not been assigned to a specific judge. The lawsuit is related to a product liability claim and the exact nature of the claims is not publicly available.
On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has been notified that a subsequent document has been served in the case of HUERTA v. FLINT GROUP PACKAGING INKS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION et al. This document is a proof of service, indicating that the required documents have been delivered to the.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A new case, OSBORNE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al, was filed in the court, with case number 3:26-cv-04713. This case is related to the existing case GAUFF v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC et al. The filing of this new case may indicate a new development or a new. On April 26, 2026, the docket recorded a order: A Motion was filed.
On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case GAUFF v. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealing of these documents may impact the public's ability to access.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court has been notified that a subsequent document has been served in the case of HUERTA v. FLINT GROUP PACKAGING INKS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION et al. This document is a proof of service, indicating that the required documents have been delivered to the relevant parties. The case number is 2:26-cv-04713, and the judge presiding over the case is HUERTA.
A new case, OSBORNE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al, was filed in the court, with case number 3:26-cv-04713. This case is related to the existing case GAUFF v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC et al. The filing of this new case may indicate a new development or a new plaintiff in the ongoing litigation.
A Motion was filed.
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case GAUFF v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC et al. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealing of these documents may impact the public's ability to access information about the case.
Proof of Service (subsequent documents) ( 3
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ( 10
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
13 hours, 56 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.