legal-news

Gammill v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

26-cv-21023
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Gammill is suing Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company in a case docketed as 26-cv-21023. Hartford has filed an answer to the complaint, moving the case past the pleading stage and into the early phases of litigation. Insurance disputes of this type typically involve denial of benefits, bad faith claims handling, or disputes over policy interpretation. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) may govern if the policy was employer-sponsored, which would limit Gammill's remedies and the applicable standard of review.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Insurance benefit denial or coverage dispute
  • • Potential ERISA preemption and limited remedies
  • • Bad faith claims handling allegations
  • • Policy interpretation and Hartford's defenses
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 20, 2026

5:25-cv-10619 Remesz v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options ( 22

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 20, 2026

1:26-cv-21023 Gammill v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 20, 2026

4:25-cv-01408 Richardson v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company et al

The parties filed a joint stipulation.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

2 hours, 13 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.