Fritz et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
Case Summary
Plaintiffs Fritz and others filed suit against the United States Environmental Protection Agency and related parties in the District of Colorado. The case involves challenges to EPA actions or regulations, likely concerning environmental policy or enforcement. The docket number is 26-cv-02005.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Environmental regulation compliance
- • Administrative agency authority
- • Federal environmental policy
Docket Snapshot
Court
D. Colo.
District of Colorado · 10th Circuit · CO
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-02005 Fritz et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Colorado, a federal district court in CO.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes United States Environmental Protection Agency.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
District of Colorado (D. Colo.) is a federal district court in the 10th Circuit, CO.
Case Timeline
1 event1:26-cv-02005 Fritz et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
The case Fritz et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al was filed under docket number 1:26-cv-02005. This marks the official start of litigation involving the plaintiffs Fritz and others against the EPA and related parties. The filing triggers the legal process where both sides will present their claims and defenses.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 hours, 15 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.