2:24-cv-06537 Maria T. Aceves v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Text Only Scheduling Notice
FREEMAN v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. is a civil case with an unknown court and docket number 23-cv-03630. The case is currently in the stipulation and order of dismissal phase, likely due to a settlement or other agreement between the parties. The exact details of the settlement are not specified.
Latest development
Order · April 22, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:24-cv-06537 Maria T. Aceves v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Other · Apr 23, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes National Railroad Passenger Corporation, National Railroad Passenger Corp, Maria T. Aceves.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
FREEMAN v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 23-cv-03630.
The dispute currently identifies 2:24-cv-06537 Maria T. Aceves on one side and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP, National Railroad Passenger Corp, and National Railroad Passenger Corporation on the other. The case is currently organized around settlement.
is a civil case with an unknown court and docket number 23-cv-03630. The case is currently in the stipulation and order of dismissal phase, likely due to a settlement or other agreement between the parties. The exact details of the settlement are not specified.
On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Maria T. Aceves v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., which is a separate case from Freeman v. This notice sets a schedule for the case, but the details are not specified. National Railroad Passenger Corp., case number 2:24-cv-06537. This notice sets a schedule for the case, which is a separate matter from the Freeman v. On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order. On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a hearing: The court held a hearing in the case of Freeman v. (1:23-cv-03630) to set or reset deadlines.
The hearing was scheduled to address the status of the case. The court's decision will impact the timeline for the case.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Maria T. Aceves v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., which is a separate case from Freeman v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. This notice sets a schedule for the case, but the details are not specified. The notice is a procedural step in the case.
The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Maria T. Aceves v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., case number 2:24-cv-06537. This notice sets a schedule for the case, which is a separate matter from the Freeman v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. case. The scheduling notice is a routine procedural step in the case.
The court issued an order.
The court held a hearing in the case of Freeman v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (1:23-cv-03630) to set or reset deadlines. The hearing was scheduled to address the status of the case. The court's decision will impact the timeline for the case.
Text Only Scheduling Notice
Stipulation and Order of Dismissal ( 7
~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.