legal-news

Franck Slama v. Julien Entertainment.com, Inc. et al

25-cv-09129
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Franck Slama sued Julien Entertainment.com, Inc. and co-defendants under docket 25-cv-09129. The court issued a Preliminary Injunction — docket entry 37 — signaling that Slama persuaded a judge, at least at the threshold stage, that he faces irreparable harm and has a likelihood of success on the merits. Preliminary injunctions are hard to win. Their issuance here puts real pressure on the defendants and suggests the dispute involves time-sensitive conduct — likely involving intellectual property, contract rights, or business operations tied to the entertainment platform.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Grounds and scope of the preliminary injunction
  • • Underlying claims against Julien Entertainment.com
  • • Irreparable harm showing by plaintiff
  • • Likelihood of success on the merits at preliminary stage
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 20, 2026

2:25-cv-09129 Franck Slama v. Julien Entertainment.com, Inc. et al

A federal court is considering a preliminary injunction in Franck Slama's suit against Julien Entertainment.com, Inc. The filing, docketed as 2:25-cv-09129, signals Slama is asking the court to order the defendants to stop — or start — doing something before the case reaches trial. Preliminary injunction proceedings move fast and carry real stakes: a ruling either freezes the status quo or lets the defendant keep operating.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 6 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.