1:15-cv-06279 Francisco v. Abengoa, S.A. et al
Withdraw as Attorney ( 238
Civil case in S.D.N.Y. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:15-cv-06279 Francisco v. Abengoa, S.A. et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:15-cv-06279 Francisco v. Abengoa, S.A. et al
Other · May 07, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:15-cv-06279 Francisco and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Francisco v. Abengoa, S.A. et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 15-cv-06279.
The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 1:15-cv-06279 Francisco. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 7, 2026, the docket recorded a other: 1:15-cv-06279 Francisco v. et al.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
1:15-cv-06279 Francisco v. Abengoa, S.A. et al.
Withdraw as Attorney ( 238
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
10 hours, 14 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.