legal-news

FOULKES v. PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD.

25-cv-24551
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

FOULKES v. PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD. is a civil case with docket number 25-cv-24551. The current summary indicates that the parties have submitted a witness list. The court has reviewed this list and has made no further action at this time.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • witness list
  • docket number 25-cv-24551
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 27, 2026

2:24-cv-02510 David E. Talcott v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. et al

Judge David E. Talcott presided over a case against Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. in the US District Court for the Central District of California. The case, 2:24-cv-02510, was assigned to Judge Talcott. The details of the case are not specified.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-24748 O'Malley v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.

The court granted a miscellaneous relief in the case of O'Malley v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. (1:25-cv-24748), which is related to the Foulkes v. case. This decision likely affects the ongoing proceedings in Foulkes.

info
Other April 24, 2026

1:25-cv-24551 FOULKES v. PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD.

The court has released the witness list for the FOULKES v. PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD. case, which includes 19 individuals. This list is a key part of the discovery process, as it outlines the key witnesses who will testify in the case. The release of the witness list is a significant development in the litigation.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

1 week, 2 days ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.