3:25-cv-30066 Foster et al v. Hitachi Kokusai Electric Comark LLC
Stipulation of Dismissal ( 14
Civil case in D. Mass. currently marked active. Latest development: 3:25-cv-30066 Foster et al v. Hitachi Kokusai Electric Comark LLC. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-30066 Foster et al v. Hitachi Kokusai Electric Comark LLC
Other · Apr 29, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Hitachi Kokusai Electric Comark LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Build et al v. Hitachi Kokusai Electric Comark LLC is an active civil matter in District of Massachusetts under docket 25-cv-30066.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Hitachi Kokusai Electric Comark LLC. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, settlement, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint stipulation.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
The parties filed a joint stipulation.
Stipulation of Dismissal ( 14
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
11 hours, 8 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.