newspaper
2:25-cv-11901 SOHO APPAREL, LTD. v. CAPITAL LOGISTICS & WAREHOUSING GROUP, INC. et al
May 7, 2026
1 min read
legal-news
Forace R. Hogan v. United Airlines, Inc. et al
25-cv-11901
C.D. Cal.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court has denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Soho Apparel, Ltd. against Capital Logistics & Warehousing Group, Inc. and others. This decision allows the lawsuit to proceed. The lawsuit is unrelated to the Hogan v. United Airlines case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-11901 SOHO APPAREL, LTD. v. CAPITAL LOGISTICS & WAREHOUSING GROUP, INC. et al
Other · May 07, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes CAPITAL LOGISTICS & WAREHOUSING GROUP, INC, United Airlines, Inc, 2:25-cv-11901 SOHO APPAREL, LTD and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
May 7, 2026
2:25-cv-11901 SOHO APPAREL, LTD. v. CAPITAL LOGISTICS & WAREHOUSING GROUP, INC. et al
The court has denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Soho Apparel, Ltd. against Capital Logistics & Warehousing Group, Inc. and others. This decision allows the lawsuit to proceed. The lawsuit is unrelated to the Hogan v. United Airlines case.
info
Other
May 4, 2026
2:25-cv-11901 Forace R. Hogan v. United Airlines, Inc. et al
Forace R. Hogan's attorney withdrew from the case Forace R. Hogan v. United Airlines, Inc. et al. This means the attorney is no longer representing Hogan in the lawsuit. The withdrawal may impact the case's progress and timeline.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
2:25-cv-11901 Forace R. Hogan v. United Airlines, Inc. et al
Withdraw as Attorney ( 20
May 4, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.