legal-news

Flores-Duarte Files Habeas Corpus Petition in Florida Federal Court

26-cv-61147
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Flores-Duarte has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in a Florida federal court, docketed as 26-cv-61147. The petition is the initiating document, entry 1, meaning this case is at its earliest stage. Habeas petitions in federal court typically challenge the legality of a state or federal detention on constitutional grounds. Florida federal habeas cases often follow exhaustion of state court remedies. The petitioner must show a constitutional violation — commonly ineffective assistance of counsel, due process failures, or unlawful sentencing — that was not adequately addressed in state proceedings.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Constitutional grounds asserted for habeas relief
  • Exhaustion of state court remedies
  • Timeliness under the one-year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2254
  • Nature of underlying conviction or detention
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 19, 2026

0:26-cv-61147 FLORES-DUARTE v. MARKWAYNE et al

Flores-Duarte filed a habeas corpus petition against Markwayne and others in what appears to be a new civil rights or immigration detention case, docketed as 0:26-cv-61147 in federal court. A habeas petition asks a court to order the government to justify why it is holding someone — if it cannot, the detainee goes free. The case is at the opening stage; no ruling has issued.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 hours, 20 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.