Fetch Rewards, LLC v. Chicago 601 Randolph LLC
Case Summary
A separate case, 1:26-cv-04918, was filed in the Northern District of Illinois. This case involves Smith v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al, but it is unrelated to the original case of Fetch Rewards, LLC v. Chicago 601 Randolph LLC. The filing of this new case does not impact the outcome of the original case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
- • Current docket activity and next procedural step
- • Contract interpretation and performance obligations
- • Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04918 McGee et al
Other · May 07, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Chicago 601 Randolph LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, 1:26-cv-04918 Fetch Rewards, LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Fetch Rewards, LLC v. Chicago 601 Randolph LLC is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 26-cv-04918.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-04918 Fetch Rewards, LLC on one side and Chicago 601 Randolph LLC and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Contract interpretation and performance obligations, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 7, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Summons was issued. On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A separate case, 1:26-cv-04918, was filed in the Northern District of Illinois. This case involves Smith v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al, but it is unrelated to the original case of Fetch Rewards, LLC v. Chicago 601 Randolph LLC. The filing of this.
On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: Fetch Rewards, LLC filed a lawsuit against Chicago 601 Randolph LLC in the Northern District of Illinois. The lawsuit is related to a dispute over a lease agreement. The exact nature of the dispute is not specified.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
3 events2:26-cv-04918 McGee et al
A Summons was issued.
1:26-cv-04918 SMITH v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC et al
A separate case, 1:26-cv-04918, was filed in the Northern District of Illinois. This case involves Smith v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al, but it is unrelated to the original case of Fetch Rewards, LLC v. Chicago 601 Randolph LLC. The filing of this new case does not impact the outcome of the original case.
1:26-cv-04918 Fetch Rewards, LLC v. Chicago 601 Randolph LLC
Fetch Rewards, LLC filed a lawsuit against Chicago 601 Randolph LLC in the Northern District of Illinois. The lawsuit is related to a dispute over a lease agreement. The exact nature of the dispute is not specified.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
1 hour, 47 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.