civil-litigation settlement federal-courts

Farzin Motamed Settles Lawsuit with Kia America

25-cv-02657 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Farzin Motamed settled a lawsuit against Kia America in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-02657. The settlement resolves the dispute between the parties.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Settlement
  • Automotive industry
  • Case resolution
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

5:25-cv-02657 Manuel C. Ynclino v. AT and T Inc. et al

Other · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs

5 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Kia America Inc, Farzin Motamed, Manuel C. Ynclino and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 19 hours ago

Farzin Motamed Settles Lawsuit with Kia America is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-02657.

The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-02657 Farzin Motamed and 5:25-cv-02657 Manuel C. Ynclino on one side and Kia America Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Settlement posture and dismissal risk, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties reported a settlement.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 5, 2026

5:25-cv-02657 Manuel C. Ynclino v. AT and T Inc. et al

The parties reported a settlement.

info
Other May 4, 2026

2:25-cv-02657 Farzin Motamed v. Kia America Inc. et al

The parties reported a settlement.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

3 days, 1 hour ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.