Evanston Insurance Company Files Civil Complaint Against MICHELSTEIN & ASHMAN, PLLC
Case Summary
Evanston Insurance Company filed a civil complaint against MICHELSTEIN & ASHMAN, PLLC in the Southern District of New York. The filing of the civil cover sheet signals the initiation of litigation. The dispute likely involves insurance coverage or professional liability issues.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Insurance dispute
- • Professional liability
- • Civil complaint
- • Contractual obligations
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-03902 Evanston Insurance Company v. MICHELSTEIN & ASHMAN, PLLC
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes MICHELSTEIN & ASHMAN, PLLC, Evanston Insurance Company and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
1 event1:26-cv-03902 Evanston Insurance Company v. MICHELSTEIN & ASHMAN, PLLC
Evanston Insurance Company filed a civil complaint against Michelstein & Ashman, PLLC, initiating case number 1:26-cv-03902. The filing of the Civil Cover Sheet marks the official start of the lawsuit in federal court. This step sets the procedural framework for the dispute to proceed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 3 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.