1:26-cv-11983 Garcia Miranda v. Wesling et al
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
The court granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Garcia Miranda v. Wesling et al, allowing the petitioner to challenge their detention. This decision is significant because it gives the petitioner a chance to argue that their detention is unlawful. The writ will be served on the respondents, who must now respond to the petition.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
The court granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Garcia Miranda v. Wesling et al, allowing the petitioner to challenge their detention. This decision is significant because it gives the petitioner a chance to argue that their detention is unlawful. The writ will be served on the respondents, who must now respond to the petition.
The court granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Emilus v. Wesling et al, allowing the plaintiff to challenge their detention. This writ is a legal mechanism that enables individuals to contest the lawfulness of their imprisonment. The court's decision will likely lead to a review of the plaintiff's detention.
The court has received a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the case of Emilus v. Wesling et al, specifically addressing the detention of Castro Mendoza. This writ is a legal request for the court to review the detention and determine if it is lawful. The petition is filed under 2241, a federal statute governing habeas corpus petitions.
The court has granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Gomes Da Silva v. Wesling et al, allowing the plaintiff to challenge their detention. This writ is a legal mechanism that enables the plaintiff to contest the lawfulness of their imprisonment. The court's decision will have significant implications for the plaintiff's freedom.
The court has been notified of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Laia Guariz v. Wesling et al, which is a separate case from Emilus v. Wesling et al. This petition seeks to challenge the detention of Laia Guariz, citing potential constitutional violations. The court will now review the petition to determine whether Guariz's detention is lawful.
The parties filed a joint stipulation.
The court granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Bastidas Godoy v. Wesling et al, allowing the plaintiff to challenge their detention. This decision is significant because it gives the plaintiff a chance to argue that their detention is unlawful. The writ of habeas corpus is a critical tool for protecting individual rights and ensuring that the government does not detain people without just cause.
A Notice of Case Assignment was filed.
A Notice of Case Assignment was filed.
The court has received a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the case of Emilus v. Wesling et al, specifically addressing the detention of Nemi. This petition seeks to challenge the legality of Nemi's confinement. The court will now review the petition to determine whether Nemi's detention is lawful.
The court granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Emilus v. Wesling et al, allowing Emilus to challenge the legality of their detention. This writ is a legal mechanism that enables a person to contest their imprisonment or confinement. The court's decision will determine whether Emilus's detention is lawful.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
Stipulation of Dismissal ( 19
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
Notice of Case Assignment
Notice of Case Assignment
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 11 articles
Timeline events
11 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 14 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.