civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch hearing

Emigrant Residential LLC v. Pinti et al

25-cv-11833 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Emigrant Residential LLC v. Pinti et al is a civil case with docket number 25-cv-11833. The current summary indicates that a clerk's entry of default has been made, but the details of the entry are not specified.

Latest development

1:25-cv-11833 Emigrant Residential LLC v. Pinti et al

Hearing · May 1, 2026

A Notice of Hearing was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Clerk's Entry of Default
  • Docket Number 25-cv-11833
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cv-11833 Cobelfret S.A. v. Joint Faith Shipping Co., Ltd.

Other · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization

5 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Joint Faith Shipping Co., Ltd, 1:25-cv-11833 Emigrant Residential LLC, 2:25-cv-11833 Cobelfret S.A and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 14 hours ago

Emigrant Residential LLC v. Pinti et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-11833.

The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-11833 Emigrant Residential LLC and 2:25-cv-11833 Cobelfret S.A on one side and Joint Faith Shipping Co., Ltd on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The clerk has entered a default in the case of Cobelfret S.A. v. Joint Faith Shipping Co., Ltd.

This means that the defendant, Joint Faith Shipping Co., Ltd., has failed to respond to the lawsuit and is now considered to have admitted to the allegations made. On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a hearing: A Notice of Hearing was filed.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 5, 2026

2:25-cv-11833 Cobelfret S.A. v. Joint Faith Shipping Co., Ltd.

The clerk has entered a default in the case of Cobelfret S.A. v. Joint Faith Shipping Co., Ltd. This means that the defendant, Joint Faith Shipping Co., Ltd., has failed to respond to the lawsuit and is now considered to have admitted to the allegations made by the plaintiff, Cobelfret S.A. The default will likely result in the court entering a judgment against the defendant.

groups
Hearing May 1, 2026

1:25-cv-11833 Emigrant Residential LLC v. Pinti et al

A Notice of Hearing was filed.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

5 hours, 16 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.