civil-litigation intellectual-property federal-courts court-watch

Elkerson v. Kezar Life Sciences Inc. et al

26-cv-05013 D.N.J.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A case with a similar name, 3:26-cv-05013 SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al, was filed in the Northern District of California. This case is unrelated to Elkerson v. Kezar Life Sciences Inc et al. The filing of this case may be relevant to the ongoing litigation in Elkerson v.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Intellectual-property ownership and infringement
  • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:26-cv-05013 SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al

Other · May 04, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Kezar Life Sciences Inc, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, 1:26-cv-05013 Elkerson and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 25 minutes ago

Elkerson v. Kezar Life Sciences Inc. et al is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 26-cv-05013.

The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-05013 Elkerson on one side and JOHNSON & JOHNSON and Kezar Life Sciences Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Intellectual-property ownership and infringement, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A case with a similar name, 3:26-cv-05013 SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al, was filed in the Northern District of California. This case is unrelated to Elkerson v. The filing of this case may be relevant to the ongoing. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Elkerson v. Kezar Life Sciences Inc case.

This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 4, 2026

3:26-cv-05013 SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al

A case with a similar name, 3:26-cv-05013 SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al, was filed in the Northern District of California. This case is unrelated to Elkerson v. Kezar Life Sciences Inc et al. The filing of this case may be relevant to the ongoing litigation in Elkerson v.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:26-cv-05013 Elkerson v. Kezar Life Sciences Inc et al

The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Elkerson v. Kezar Life Sciences Inc case. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving trade secrets and confidential business information.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

25 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.