Ekman v. Selby et al
Case Summary
Ekman v. Selby et al is a case where Ekman is suing Selby and others. The case was filed with docket number 26-cv-05256. The lawsuit suggests that Ekman may be seeking compensation or damages.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • lawsuit
- • Ekman
- • 26-cv-05256
Docket Snapshot
Court
W.D. Wash.
Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-05256 Velgos v. Elite Call Inc.
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Elite Call Inc and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.
Case Timeline
2 events1:26-cv-05256 Velgos v. Elite Call Inc.
The court has taken notice of a separate case, Velgos v. Elite Call Inc., which has been filed in the same jurisdiction as Ekman v. Selby et al. This case may be relevant to the ongoing proceedings in Ekman v. Selby et al, potentially impacting the outcome or strategy of the case. The court's awareness of this separate case suggests that it may be considering its implications for the Ekman case.
3:26-cv-05256 Ekman v. Selby et al
A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
3:26-cv-05256 Ekman v. Selby et al
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (case) ( 3
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 6 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.