Efrian Carrillo sues Caliber Holdings L.L.C. and others in California employment dispute
Case Summary
Efrian Carrillo sued Caliber Holdings L.L.C. and others in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-10270. The case involves employment or contractual disputes. The court is examining claims related to labor practices, compensation, or contract enforcement.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Employment dispute
- • Contract enforcement
- • Compensation claims
- • Labor law
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-10270 Efrian Carrillo v. Caliber Holdings L.L.C. et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Caliber Holdings LLC, Efrian Carrillo and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:25-cv-10270 Efrian Carrillo v. Caliber Holdings L.L.C. et al
Efrian Carrillo filed a new case against Caliber Holdings L.L.C. and others, initiating litigation under docket number 2:25-cv-10270. This marks the formal start of the dispute in court, setting the stage for potential claims and defenses. The case's progress will determine the parties' legal rights and obligations.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 21 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.