civil-litigation settlement contract-dispute federal-courts

Eagan v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.: Stipulation of Dismissal

24-cv-07975 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court has been notified that the parties in Eagan v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. have agreed to dismiss the case. This stipulation of dismissal is a formal agreement between the parties to end the lawsuit. The case, 1:25-cv-10797, has been dismissed.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Contract interpretation and performance obligations
  • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
  • Settlement posture and dismissal risk
  • Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-10797 ANI v. REAGAN

Other · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 10 hours, 21 minutes ago

Eagan v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.: Stipulation of Dismissal is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 24-cv-07975.

The main identified defendant or respondent is NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. The case is currently organized around Contract interpretation and performance obligations, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Settlement posture and dismissal risk, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has been notified that the parties in Eagan v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. have agreed to dismiss the case.

This stipulation of dismissal is a formal agreement between the parties to end the lawsuit. The case, 1:25-cv-10797, has been. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint stipulation.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 30, 2026

1:25-cv-10797 ANI v. REAGAN

The court has been notified that the parties in Eagan v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc. have agreed to dismiss the case. This stipulation of dismissal is a formal agreement between the parties to end the lawsuit. The case, 1:25-cv-10797, has been dismissed.

info
Other April 30, 2026

3:24-cv-07975 EAGAN v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC

The parties filed a joint stipulation.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

10 hours, 21 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.