newspaper
legal-news
Dunn v. Avlon Industries et al
26-cv-04989
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court has consolidated the case of Dunn v. Avlon Industries et al with Wallace v. Avlon Industries et al, assigning the new case number 1:26-cv-05027. This consolidation will streamline the proceedings and allow the court to manage the cases more efficiently. The consolidation is likely to affect the scheduling and discovery process in the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
3 events
info
Other
April 30, 2026
1:26-cv-05027 Wallace v. Avlon Industries et al
The court has consolidated the case of Dunn v. Avlon Industries et al with Wallace v. Avlon Industries et al, assigning the new case number 1:26-cv-05027. This consolidation will streamline the proceedings and allow the court to manage the cases more efficiently. The consolidation is likely to affect the scheduling and discovery process in the case.
info
Other
April 30, 2026
1:26-cv-04991 Walden v. Avlon Industries et al
The court has consolidated the case of Dunn v. Avlon Industries et al with Walden v. Avlon Industries et al, assigning the case the docket number 1:26-cv-04991. This consolidation will allow the court to manage the two cases together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation was ordered by Judge Walden.
info
Other
April 30, 2026
1:26-cv-04989 Dunn v. Avlon Industries et al
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the Dunn v. Avlon Industries case, citing concerns for the safety of a witness. The sealed document is likely related to the witness's testimony. This decision allows the court to protect the witness's identity.
Advertisement
newspaper
3 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 16 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.