1:23-cv-06400 Donoghue v. Rosatti et al
Declaration in Support of Motion ( 101
Donoghue v. Rosatti et al is a case where the parties have filed a declaration in support of a motion. The case was filed in the unknown court with docket number 23-cv-06400. The declaration was filed on an unknown date.
Latest development
Motion · April 24, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:23-cv-06400 Donoghue v. Rosatti et al
Motion · Apr 24, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated April 24, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:23-cv-06400 Donoghue and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Donoghue v. Rosatti et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 23-cv-06400.
The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 1:23-cv-06400 Donoghue. The case is currently organized around Declaration, Supporting Documents.
Rosatti et al is a case where the parties have filed a declaration in support of a motion. The case was filed in the unknown court with docket number 23-cv-06400. The declaration was filed on an unknown date.
On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: A Motion was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest motion produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
A Motion was filed.
Declaration in Support of Motion ( 101
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 18 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.