Doe v. United States Food and Drug Administration

description

Case Summary

The court granted an extension of time for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC to file a response in the Doe v. United States Food and Drug Administration case. This means Strike 3 Holdings, LLC now has more time to prepare its response. The extension is relevant to the ongoing case.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:26-cv-20907 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

Other · May 07, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes United States Food and Drug Administration, 1:26-cv-20907 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Case Timeline

2 events

info

Other May 7, 2026

1:26-cv-20907 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

The court granted an extension of time for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC to file a response in the Doe v. United States Food and Drug Administration case. This means Strike 3 Holdings, LLC now has more time to prepare its response. The extension is relevant to the ongoing case.

description View filing open_in_new

info

Other May 6, 2026

3:24-cv-02398 Doe v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a memorandum in the case of Doe v. United States Food and Drug Administration, affirming a lower court's decision. The memorandum is a non-precedential opinion, meaning it does not set a binding legal precedent. This decision is significant because it upholds the FDA's actions in the case.

description View filing open_in_new

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles

All No paywall (2) Original reporting (2)

newspaper

Coverage

1:26-cv-20907 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

Extension of Time ( 8

May 7, 2026 · 1 min read

newspaper

Coverage

3:24-cv-02398 Doe v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al

USCA Memorandum ( 131

May 6, 2026 · 1 min read