1:25-cv-24046 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Satisfaction of Judgment ( 40
Jane or John Doe filed suit against a Schedule A list of anonymous online defendants under docket 26-cv-21188. This filing pattern is common in intellectual property enforcement actions — typically trademark or copyright infringement — targeting overseas sellers operating through e-commerce platforms. The only docket activity noted is returned mail, suggesting service of process has not been completed. Schedule A cases routinely seek temporary restraining orders and asset freezes against defendants identified only by platform usernames or store names. The returned mail notation signals early-stage service problems that could delay or derail the action.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Satisfaction of Judgment ( 40
Leave to File Document ( 4
The court granted Strike 3 Holdings an extension to file a document in this John Doe copyright infringement case, docket 1:26-cv-10209. Strike 3 routinely files these suits to subpoena ISPs for subscriber identities behind IP addresses accused of pirating adult content. Deadline extensions in these cases often signal the plaintiff is still waiting on ISP data before it can name a real defendant.
The court granted Strike 3 Holdings an extension to file a document in this John Doe copyright infringement case, docket 1:26-cv-10208. Strike 3 routinely files these suits to subpoena ISPs for subscriber identities before defendants even know they're being sued. A filing deadline just moved, which means the case stays alive longer before Strike 3 must show its hand.
The court granted Strike 3 Holdings, LLC more time to file a document in this Schedule A defendant case in the Northern District of Illinois. These cases typically involve mass copyright infringement claims against anonymous defendants identified only by IP address, and deadline extensions at this stage often signal the plaintiff is still working through subpoena responses from ISPs to unmask the John Doe defendant.
Amended Complaint ( 12
The court granted Strike 3 Holdings, LLC more time to file a document in this Schedule A infringement case against an anonymous defendant. These cases — filed in bulk against John Does identified only by IP address — live or die on early procedural moves, and deadline extensions often signal the plaintiff is still chasing identifying information from an ISP. A missed window here can collapse the whole case before the defendant is ever named.
The court granted Strike 3 Holdings, LLC more time to file a document in this Schedule A IP enforcement case pending in what appears to be a federal district court. These cases — filed against anonymous defendants identified only as 'John Doe' — are a standard vehicle for adult content copyright holders pursuing BitTorrent pirates. An extension this early usually means Strike 3 is still waiting on subpoena returns from ISPs to identify the defendant before it can move forward.
Leave to File Document ( 4
A new federal case was filed — Garyck Truls Arntzen v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, docket 1:26-cv-04399. The 'Schedule A' format is a mass-defendant structure used almost exclusively in intellectual property cases, typically trademark or copyright infringement, where plaintiffs sue dozens or hundreds of anonymous online sellers at once. The actual defendants and their identities are sealed at filing to prevent them from vanishing before the court can freeze their assets or storefronts.
A Schedule A defendants case was filed in what appears to be the Southern District of Florida under docket 1:26-cv-21188, naming a plaintiff identified only as 'Doe' against a group of unnamed individuals, partnerships, and unincorporated associations. These cases typically involve mass trademark or copyright infringement claims against overseas e-commerce sellers, with defendants identified only in a sealed schedule to prevent them from hiding assets before service. No description was provided, so the specific IP rights at issue are unknown.
A piece of mail sent by the court came back undelivered in Doe v. The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 1:25-cv-03514. That means at least one party's address of record is wrong or stale, and service or notice to that party is now in question.
Satisfaction of Judgment ( 40
Leave to File Document ( 4
Extension of Time to File Document ( 10
Extension of Time to File Document ( 11
Extension of Time to File Document ( 11
Amended Complaint ( 12
Extension of Time to File Document ( 10
Extension of Time to File Document ( 11
Leave to File Document ( 4
Sources tracked
4 outlets · 16 articles
Timeline events
16 records on file
Last updated
3 hours, 12 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.