Doe v. Combs et al
Case Summary
The case Doe v. Combs et al was filed under docket number 1:24-cv-09852. The filing initiates litigation involving the parties Doe and Combs et al. This step matters because it officially starts the legal process and sets the stage for further court actions.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-07397 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:25-cv-07397 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
3 events1:25-cv-07397 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
An Amended Complaint was filed.
1:24-cv-09852 Doe v. Combs et al
The case Doe v. Combs et al was filed under docket number 1:24-cv-09852. The filing initiates litigation involving the parties Doe and Combs et al. This step matters because it officially starts the legal process and sets the stage for further court actions.
1:24-cv-07778 Doe v. Combs et al
The case Doe v. Combs et al was filed under docket number 1:24-cv-07778. This marks the official start of litigation between the parties. The filing triggers deadlines for initial disclosures and motions.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
4 hours, 33 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.