5:26-cv-01173 Bianca Johnston v. Thirdlove Inc.
Extend Time to File Answer ( 13
The case of Dinh v. Depop, Inc., with docket number 26-cv-01173, involves an ADR certification. The details of the certification and the reasons behind it are not specified in the current summary. The case is currently pending in an unknown court. The plaintiff, Dinh, is seeking relief from Depop, Inc., but the nature of the relief is unclear.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-01173 Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
4 sources tracked
Participants
4 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes MOUNT LAUREL BOARD OF EDUCATION, O'Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC, Thirdlove Inc and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 4 distinct sources.
Dinh v. Depop, Inc. is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-01173.
The dispute currently identifies 5:26-cv-01173 Bianca Johnston on one side and MOUNT LAUREL BOARD OF EDUCATION, O'Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC, and Thirdlove Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around ADR certification.
The case of Dinh v. Depop, Inc., with docket number 26-cv-01173, involves an ADR certification. The details of the certification and the reasons behind it are not specified in the current summary.
The case is currently pending in an unknown court. The plaintiff, Dinh, is seeking relief from Depop, Inc., but the nature of the relief is unclear.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: Bianca Johnston, a defendant in the case Dinh v. Depop, Inc., received an extension to file an answer. The court granted this extension, allowing Johnston more time to respond to the original complaint.
This extension is significant because it gives Johnston. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint status report. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.
On April 21, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court certified that the parties discussed alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options in the case Dinh v. This certification is a procedural step in the litigation process. It indicates that the parties have considered ADR as a potential.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court filed the Social Security Administration (SSA) Administrative Record in the case Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security, docket number 1:26-cv-01173, in the Central District of California. This document compiles the evidence and records considered by the SSA in the underlying benefits decision. It matters because the administrative record forms the basis for judicial review of the SSA's decision.
Bianca Johnston, a defendant in the case Dinh v. Depop, Inc., received an extension to file an answer. The court granted this extension, allowing Johnston more time to respond to the original complaint. This extension is significant because it gives Johnston additional time to prepare her defense.
The parties filed a joint status report.
The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.
The court certified that the parties discussed alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options in the case Dinh v. Depop, Inc. This certification is a procedural step in the litigation process. It indicates that the parties have considered ADR as a potential means of resolving the dispute.
Extend Time to File Answer ( 13
Joint Status Report ( 11
Answer to Amended Complaint ( 8
ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options ( 15
Sources tracked
4 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 9 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.