civil-litigation education federal-courts court-watch

Dinh v. Depop involves ADR certification in Central District of California case

26-cv-01173 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The case of Dinh v. Depop, Inc., with docket number 26-cv-01173, involves an ADR certification. The details of the certification and the reasons behind it are not specified in the current summary. The case is currently pending in an unknown court. The plaintiff, Dinh, is seeking relief from Depop, Inc., but the nature of the relief is unclear.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • ADR certification
  • Dinh
  • Depop, Inc
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:26-cv-01173 Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

4 articles

4 sources tracked

groups

Participants

4 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes MOUNT LAUREL BOARD OF EDUCATION, O'Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC, Thirdlove Inc and others.

Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 4 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 15 hours ago

Dinh v. Depop, Inc. is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-01173.

The dispute currently identifies 5:26-cv-01173 Bianca Johnston on one side and MOUNT LAUREL BOARD OF EDUCATION, O'Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC, and Thirdlove Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around ADR certification.

The case of Dinh v. Depop, Inc., with docket number 26-cv-01173, involves an ADR certification. The details of the certification and the reasons behind it are not specified in the current summary.

The case is currently pending in an unknown court. The plaintiff, Dinh, is seeking relief from Depop, Inc., but the nature of the relief is unclear.

On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: Bianca Johnston, a defendant in the case Dinh v. Depop, Inc., received an extension to file an answer. The court granted this extension, allowing Johnston more time to respond to the original complaint.

This extension is significant because it gives Johnston. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint status report. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.

On April 21, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court certified that the parties discussed alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options in the case Dinh v. This certification is a procedural step in the litigation process. It indicates that the parties have considered ADR as a potential.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

5 events
info
Other May 12, 2026

1:26-cv-01173 Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security

The court filed the Social Security Administration (SSA) Administrative Record in the case Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security, docket number 1:26-cv-01173, in the Central District of California. This document compiles the evidence and records considered by the SSA in the underlying benefits decision. It matters because the administrative record forms the basis for judicial review of the SSA's decision.

info
Other May 4, 2026

5:26-cv-01173 Bianca Johnston v. Thirdlove Inc.

Bianca Johnston, a defendant in the case Dinh v. Depop, Inc., received an extension to file an answer. The court granted this extension, allowing Johnston more time to respond to the original complaint. This extension is significant because it gives Johnston additional time to prepare her defense.

info
Other April 30, 2026

2:26-cv-01173 Jones v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC et al

The parties filed a joint status report.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-01173 GARDNER v. MOUNT LAUREL BOARD OF EDUCATION et al

The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.

info
Other April 21, 2026

3:26-cv-01173 Dinh v. Depop, Inc.

The court certified that the parties discussed alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options in the case Dinh v. Depop, Inc. This certification is a procedural step in the litigation process. It indicates that the parties have considered ADR as a potential means of resolving the dispute.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

4 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

4 outlets · 4 articles

Timeline events

5 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 9 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.