newspaper
3:26-cv-02496 Delviscovo v. Monsanto Company
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 9
May 4, 2026
1 min read
civil-litigation
federal-courts
court-watch
Delviscovo v. Monsanto: Certificate of Interested Entities Filed
26-cv-02496
N.D. Cal.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Delviscovo v. Monsanto in the Northern District of California includes a certificate of interested entities filing. This procedural step identifies stakeholders with financial interests in the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Corporate disclosure
- • Interested parties
- • Product liability or environmental claim
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
5:26-cv-02496 HAKOBYAN v. SEMAIA et al
Other · May 11, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Monsanto Company, 3:26-cv-02496 Delviscovo, 5:26-cv-02496 HAKOBYAN and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
chronic
Updated 3 days, 12 hours ago
The Story So Far
Delviscovo v. Monsanto: Certificate of Interested Entities Filed is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 26-cv-02496.
The dispute currently identifies 3:26-cv-02496 Delviscovo on one side and Monsanto Company on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts, court watch.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The plaintiff, Delviscovo, filed a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures in the case 3:26-cv-02496 Delviscovo v. Monsanto Company. This filing is a required disclosure of any potential conflicts of.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
May 11, 2026
5:26-cv-02496 HAKOBYAN v. SEMAIA et al
The plaintiff in Hakobyan v. Semaia filed a Civil Cover Sheet, a standard document that lists parties and case details. This filing officially starts the case and provides the court with necessary information to manage the lawsuit. It signals the formal commencement of litigation in the Southern District of New York.
info
Other
May 4, 2026
3:26-cv-02496 Delviscovo v. Monsanto Company
The plaintiff, Delviscovo, filed a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures in the case 3:26-cv-02496 Delviscovo v. Monsanto Company. This filing is a required disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest or affiliations with other parties involved in the case. The filing is a routine step in the litigation process.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
4 hours, 40 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.