legal-news

Delgado v. Chicago Auto Pound et al

26-cv-04578
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Delgado filed a lawsuit against Chicago Auto Pound et al in the unknown court. The case is docketed as 26-cv-04578. The current summary mentions attorney representation.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Lawsuit
  • Chicago Auto Pound et al
  • Attorney representation
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 27, 2026

3:26-cv-04578 KENIOUA v. CMA CGM (AMERICA) LLC et al

A new case, 3:26-cv-04578 KENIOUA v. CMA CGM (AMERICA) LLC et al, was filed in the Northern District of Illinois. This case is separate from Delgado v. Chicago Auto Pound et al. The filing is an exhibit to a document in the case.

info
Other April 27, 2026

2:26-cv-04578 KENIOUA v. CMA CGM (AMERICA) LLC et al

The court allowed a corporate disclosure statement to be filed in the case Amplio v. CMA CGM (America) LLC, which is a separate case from Delgado v. Chicago Auto Pound. This statement discloses the corporate interests involved in the Amplio case. The filing is a procedural step in the litigation process.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-04578 Delgado v. Chicago Auto Pound et al

The court granted attorney representation to plaintiff Delgado in the case of Delgado v. Chicago Auto Pound et al. This means that Delgado will now have a lawyer to represent them in the case. The court's decision is significant because it ensures that Delgado has access to legal representation.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

12 hours, 10 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.