legal-news

Davis v. Schultz

26-cv-02641
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court has designated the case 'Elixir Cosmetics OpCo, LLC v. HDMA, INC. et al' as a related case to 'Davis v. Schultz' (2:26-cv-02641). This means that the two cases will be connected and potentially impacted by each other's proceedings. The designation is likely to affect the scheduling and management of the cases.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 28, 2026

1:26-cv-02641 Cherry v. Sentry Credit Inc et al

The court entered judgment.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 27, 2026

2:26-cv-02641 Elixir Cosmetics OpCo, LLC v. HDMA, INC. et al

The court has designated the case 'Elixir Cosmetics OpCo, LLC v. HDMA, INC. et al' as a related case to 'Davis v. Schultz' (2:26-cv-02641). This means that the two cases will be connected and potentially impacted by each other's proceedings. The designation is likely to affect the scheduling and management of the cases.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 27, 2026

4:26-cv-02641 Davis v. Schultz

The court granted the plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing them to proceed with their case without paying the required filing fee. This decision is significant because it enables the plaintiff to continue pursuing their claim despite financial constraints. The court's ruling is a procedural step that allows the case to move forward.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

5 hours, 21 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.