5:25-cv-01636 Ross Rice v. California Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence, Inc. et al
Text Only Scheduling Notice
Darwish v. No Named Respondent is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 25-cv-01636. The case involves a lawsuit against an unnamed respondent, but the details of the case are not publicly available.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
A scheduling notice was filed in a separate case, Ross Rice v. California Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence, Inc. et al, which is unrelated to Darwish v. No Named Respondent. This notice is a routine procedural step in the case, and its filing does not directly impact the Darwish case. The notice simply informs the parties and the court of upcoming deadlines and hearings.
The court granted an extension of time for discovery in the case of Hood v. Mariano's Fresh Market, allowing the parties more time to complete the discovery process. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to gather evidence and prepare for trial. The extension is for 40 days.
The court dismissed the case Darwish v. No Named Respondent due to a lack of a named respondent. This means the plaintiff, Darwish, failed to identify a defendant in the lawsuit. The dismissal is significant because it highlights the importance of proper pleading in court proceedings.
Text Only Scheduling Notice
Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 40
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
4 days, 18 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.