DAMUS et al v. PRIMARK US CORP et al
Case Summary
DAMUS et al v. PRIMARK US CORP et al is a civil case with an order on motion to dismiss filed. The case was filed in the unknown court with docket number 25-cv-13854. The order was filed on an unknown date. The case is ongoing.
Latest development
2:25-cv-13854 DAMUS et al v. PRIMARK US CORP et al
Order · April 29, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • order on motion to dismiss
- • unknown court
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:10-cr-00686-2 USA v. ADAMES et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes PRIMARK US CORP and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
2 events1:10-cr-00686-2 USA v. ADAMES et al
The court issued a notice of electronic filing (NEF) for a finance-related document in the case USA v. ADAMES et al, which is a separate case from DAMUS et al v. PRIMARK US CORP et al. This NEF indicates that a financial document has been electronically filed in the USA v. ADAMES et al case. The document is likely related to the financial aspects of the case.
2:25-cv-13854 DAMUS et al v. PRIMARK US CORP et al
A Motion was filed.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
2:25-cv-13854 DAMUS et al v. PRIMARK US CORP et al
Order on Motion to Dismiss ( 48
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
23 hours, 1 minute ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.