1:24-cv-12842 Washington v. Chicago et al
Extension of Time to File Answer ( 69
The court granted an extension of time for the defendants in the Crafton et al v. Chicago et al case to file their answer. The extension was granted in a separate case, Washington v. Chicago et al, with docket number 1:24-cv-12842. This means the defendants now have more time to respond to the plaintiffs' claims.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-12842 Washington v. Chicago et al
Other · Apr 29, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:24-cv-12842 Washington and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
The court granted an extension of time for the defendants in the Crafton et al v. Chicago et al case to file their answer. The extension was granted in a separate case, Washington v. Chicago et al, with docket number 1:24-cv-12842. This means the defendants now have more time to respond to the plaintiffs' claims.
The court granted an extension of time for the parties in Crafton et al v. Chicago et al to complete discovery, allowing them more time to gather and exchange evidence. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to prepare for potential trial. The extension is for 62 days.
Extension of Time to File Answer ( 69
Extension of Time to Complete Discovery ( 62
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.