2:26-cv-01722 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 172.119.130.108
Extension of Time to File Document ( 13
Cook v. SoFi Technologies, Inc. is a case involving a clerk's notice re: consent or declination. The details of the case are not provided. The clerk's notice is a common tool used by the court to notify parties of their obligations and deadlines. The case is currently in an unknown court with docket number 26-cv-01722.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-01722 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 172.119.130.108
Other · May 08, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
4 sources tracked
Participants
3 Defendants, 3 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization
9 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes John Doe subscriber, SoFi Technologies, Inc, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 4 distinct sources.
Cook v. SoFi Technologies, Inc. is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 26-cv-01722.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-01722 Davidson (PS) and 3:26-cv-01722 RIDENOUR on one side and JOHNSON & JOHNSON and SoFi Technologies, Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around clerk's notice, consent or declination, unknown court.
is a case involving a clerk's notice re: consent or declination. The details of the case are not provided. The clerk's notice is a common tool used by the court to notify parties of their obligations and deadlines.
The case is currently in an unknown court with docket number 26-cv-01722.
On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Appearance was filed. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A separate case, 1:26-cv-01722 Davidson (PS) v. Pototski, was filed against SoFi Technologies, Inc.
This case is unrelated to Cook v. but is another lawsuit against the company. On April 21, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The clerk of the court sent a notice to the parties in Cook v. regarding their consent or declination to proceed with the case. This notice is a standard procedure in federal court cases, where parties are given the opportunity to.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
The court granted a 14-day extension to file a document in the case of Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, allowing the plaintiff more time to prepare their submission. This extension was granted in the case 2:26-cv-01722, which is unrelated to Cook v. SoFi Technologies, Inc. The extension is significant because it gives the plaintiff more time to gather evidence and build their case.
A Notice of Appearance was filed.
A separate case, 1:26-cv-01722 Davidson (PS) v. Pototski, was filed against SoFi Technologies, Inc. This case is unrelated to Cook v. SoFi Technologies, Inc. but is another lawsuit against the company.
The clerk of the court sent a notice to the parties in Cook v. SoFi Technologies, Inc. regarding their consent or declination to proceed with the case. This notice is a standard procedure in federal court cases, where parties are given the opportunity to opt-out of the case or decline to participate. The notice is a key step in the litigation process.
Extension of Time to File Document ( 13
Notice of Appearance ( 3
Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination
Sources tracked
4 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
18 hours, 19 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.