Convicted Felon Charged for Receipt of Child Pornography
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah – A federal grand jury in Salt Lake City returned a superseding indictment charging an alleged child sex offender for receiving sexually explicit images of a …
A federal grand jury in Salt Lake City returned a superseding indictment charging an alleged child sex offender for receiving sexually explicit images of a child. The indictment alleges that the defendant knowingly received and distributed child pornography, which is a federal crime.
Latest development
Media Coverage · April 30, 2026
A convicted felon has been charged with receiving child pornography in a superseding indictment. This charge is a serious federal offense. The indictment was returned by a grand jury in Salt Lake City.
newspaper Read articleCourt
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Convicted Felon Charged for Receipt of Child Pornography
Media Coverage · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a media coverage dated April 30, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
A convicted felon has been charged with receiving child pornography in a superseding indictment. This charge is a serious federal offense. The indictment was returned by a grand jury in Salt Lake City.
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah – A federal grand jury in Salt Lake City returned a superseding indictment charging an alleged child sex offender for receiving sexually explicit images of a …
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
9 hours, 2 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.