legal-news

CONSTANTIN ASSOCIATES, LLP et al v. ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. et al

24-cv-09595
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

CONSTANTIN ASSOCIATES, LLP et al v. ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. et al is a business dispute case. The plaintiff, CONSTANTIN ASSOCIATES, LLP, alleges that ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. breached a contract. The case is pending in the unknown court with docket number 24-cv-09595.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • breach of contract
  • CONSTANTIN ASSOCIATES, LLP
  • ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:24-cv-09595 CONSTANTIN ASSOCIATES, LLP et al v. ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. et al

Other · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC, 2:24-cv-09595 CONSTANTIN ASSOCIATES, LLP.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 29, 2026

2:24-cv-09595 CONSTANTIN ASSOCIATES, LLP et al v. ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. et al

The court granted a motion to compel arbitration in the case of CONSTANTIN ASSOCIATES, LLP et al v. ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. et al (2:24-cv-09595). This means that the parties must resolve their dispute through arbitration rather than in court. The ruling has significant implications for the case's future proceedings.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 days, 18 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.