All parties consent to proceed before Magistrate Judge, case remains with Judge Peterson
Case Summary
All parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge while the case remains assigned to Judge Michelle L. Peterson. This consent allows the magistrate judge to handle proceedings with the parties' agreement.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Consent to magistrate judge
- • Judicial assignment
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case remains assigned to Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (TF)
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
Case Timeline
1 eventCONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case remains assigned to Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (TF) (Entered: 05/11/2026)
All parties agreed to have the case handled by a Magistrate Judge instead of a District Judge. Despite this consent, the case remains under the docket of Judge Michelle L. Peterson. This means the Magistrate Judge will oversee proceedings, but Judge Peterson retains administrative assignment.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
25 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.