Plaintiffs file Rule 56.1 statement in summary judgment prep vs NYC Department of Education

description

Case Summary

C.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education, filed in the Southern District of New York (docket 22-cv-09307), includes a Rule 56.1 statement, signaling preparation for summary judgment briefing. The case likely involves claims against the Department of Education, possibly related to policy or administrative actions affecting plaintiffs.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

• • Summary judgment preparation
• • Claims against public education entity
• • Civil rights or administrative law issues

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:22-cv-09307 C.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Government Agency

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes New York City Department of Education and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other May 11, 2026

1:22-cv-09307 C.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education

The plaintiffs in C.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education filed a Rule 56.1 Statement. This document supports or opposes a motion for summary judgment by laying out facts the party claims are undisputed. It signals the case is moving toward a potential resolution without trial.

description View filing open_in_new