Parties jointly dismiss all claims with prejudice; court closes case
Case Summary
The parties jointly stipulated to dismiss all claims in the case with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party will bear its own costs and fees. The court ordered the case closed.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Joint stipulation
- • Dismissal with prejudice
- • Costs and fees allocation
- • Case closure
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
CLERK'S ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties jointly stipulated
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
Case Timeline
1 eventCLERK'S ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties jointly stipulated to the dismissal of all claims in this action WITH PREJUDICE, (Doc. 55 ), with each party to bear its own costs and fees. At the direction of the Court, this case is CLOSED. (LCB) (Entered
The parties agreed to dismiss all claims in this case with prejudice, meaning they cannot bring the same claims again. Each side will pay its own legal costs. The court officially closed the case on May 6, 2026.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.