civil-litigation government-litigation federal-courts

CLAYTON v. OFFICE OF POLICE COMPLAINTS

25-cv-01798 D.D.C.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Clayton filed suit against the Office of Police Complaints in the District of Columbia. The docket shows a summons was returned executed against the DC Government defendant, confirming service of process and advancing the case.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Police oversight
  • Service of process
  • Government defendant
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.D.C.

District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-01798 CLAYTON v. OFFICE OF POLICE COMPLAINTS

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes OFFICE OF POLICE COMPLAINTS and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 11, 2026

1:25-cv-01798 CLAYTON v. OFFICE OF POLICE COMPLAINTS

A Summons was issued.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

5 hours, 34 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.