civil-litigation federal-courts

Court grants extension for plaintiffs to respond in Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army

22-cv-01250
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court granted an extension of time for plaintiffs to respond in Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army, docket number 22-cv-01250. This civil case involves ongoing procedural deadlines and response filings.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Extension of Time
  • Response Deadline
  • Litigation Management
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:22-cv-01250 Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army

Other · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Salvation Army.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 21 hours ago

Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army is an active civil matter under docket 22-cv-01250.

The main identified defendant or respondent is Salvation Army. The case is currently organized around extension of time, to complaint, court order.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an extension of time for the Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army case, allowing the parties to continue with their proceedings. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to prepare and present their arguments.

The.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 29, 2026

1:22-cv-01250 Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army

The court granted an extension of time for the Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army case, allowing the parties to continue with their proceedings. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to prepare and present their arguments. The extension will likely impact the overall timeline of the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 days, 13 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.