1:22-cv-01250 Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army
Extension of Time ( 323
The court granted an extension of time for plaintiffs to respond in Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army, docket number 22-cv-01250. This civil case involves ongoing procedural deadlines and response filings.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:22-cv-01250 Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army
Other · Apr 29, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Salvation Army.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army is an active civil matter under docket 22-cv-01250.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Salvation Army. The case is currently organized around extension of time, to complaint, court order.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an extension of time for the Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army case, allowing the parties to continue with their proceedings. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to prepare and present their arguments.
The.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
The court granted an extension of time for the Clancy et al v. The Salvation Army case, allowing the parties to continue with their proceedings. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to prepare and present their arguments. The extension will likely impact the overall timeline of the case.
Extension of Time ( 323
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 13 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.