legal-news

Counsel Files Notice of Appearance in Cielo Lutino v. Acquia Inc et al

25-cv-08555 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Counsel Files Notice of Appearance in Cielo Lutino v. Acquia Inc et al. Counsel for the plaintiff has filed a notice of appearance in this case. The notice indicates that counsel is representing the plaintiff.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • notice of appearance
  • Cielo Lutino v. Acquia Inc et al
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cv-08555 Cielo Lutino v. Acquia Inc et al

Other · Apr 28, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes 2:25-cv-08555 Cielo Lutino and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 28, 2026

2:25-cv-08555 Cielo Lutino v. Acquia Inc et al

A Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

16 hours, 31 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.