CHONAY CUMAR v. BORGEN et al
Case Summary
The court has allowed the defendants in the case of Torres-Castillo v. Borgen et al to file a fillable PDF. This means that the defendants can now submit their documents electronically. The change is likely to speed up the processing of the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Case Timeline
4 events3:26-cv-04856 TORRES-CASTILLO v. BORGEN et al
The court has allowed the defendants in the case of Torres-Castillo v. Borgen et al to file a fillable PDF. This means that the defendants can now submit their documents electronically. The change is likely to speed up the processing of the case.
2:26-cv-04856 TORRES-CASTILLO v. BORGEN et al
The court has been informed of a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the case of CHONAY CUMAR v. BORGEN et al. This writ is a request for the court to review the detention of an individual and determine whether it is lawful. The petition is likely a response to the detention of the plaintiff, CHONAY CUMAR.
1:26-cv-01197 Warman v. Alphabet Inc. et al
A Notice of Case Assignment was filed.
2:26-cv-01197 CHONAY CUMAR v. BORGEN et al
Judge denied the motion to dismiss filed by defendants BORGEN et al in the case CHONAY CUMAR v. BORGEN et al (2:26-cv-01197). This means the case will proceed against the defendants. The judge's decision allows the plaintiff to continue pursuing their claims.
Press Coverage
2:26-cv-04856 TORRES-CASTILLO v. BORGEN et al
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
1:26-cv-01197 Warman v. Alphabet Inc. et al
Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment - Sua Sponte
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 11 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.