civil-litigation federal-courts

Miscellaneous Relief Sought in Castillo v. Air Force Board for Corrections in N.D. Illinois

25-cv-13457 N.D. Ill.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Castillo filed a motion seeking miscellaneous relief in the Northern District of Illinois (25-cv-13457) against the Air Force Board for Corrections. The nature of relief sought is unspecified but indicates active litigation.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Miscellaneous relief
  • • Military corrections board
  • • Procedural motions
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Ill.

Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-13457 Castillo, formerly known as Jose A. Cossio, Jr. v. Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records et

Other · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records, 1:25-cv-13457 Castillo, formerly known as Jose A. Cossio, Jr and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 3 days, 5 hours ago

Castillo, formerly known as Jose A. Cossio, Jr. v. Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records et al is an active civil matter in Northern District of Illinois under docket 25-cv-13457.

The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-13457 Castillo, formerly known as Jose A. Cossio, Jr on one side and Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted miscellaneous relief in the case of Castillo v. Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records, allowing the plaintiff to proceed with their claims. This decision is significant because it enables the plaintiff to continue pursuing.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 30, 2026

1:25-cv-13457 Castillo, formerly known as Jose A. Cossio, Jr. v. Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records et al

The court granted miscellaneous relief in the case of Castillo v. Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records, allowing the plaintiff to proceed with their claims. This decision is significant because it enables the plaintiff to continue pursuing their case. The court's ruling will have a direct impact on the plaintiff's ability to seek relief from the Air Force Board.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

11 hours, 8 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.