Browse Cases

• Filed

The case titled Jessica Loza Mendez v. I.Q. Data Systems d/b/a Backgrounds Online involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Jessica Loza Mendez, and the defendant, I.Q. Data Systems, operating as Backgrounds Online. The docket references a Joint Report under Rule 26(f), indicating that the parties have engaged in preliminary discovery planning as required by federal civil procedure rules. The specifics of the claims or defenses are not detailed in the available information, but the procedural posture suggests the case is in the early stages of litigation, focusing on discovery coordination and scheduling.

• Filed

In the case of Rodionova v. Turkish Airlines, Inc., docket number 25-cv-09135, the plaintiff has filed an opposition or response to a motion submitted by the defendant. While specific details of the underlying dispute are not provided, the case involves litigation between an individual plaintiff and a major airline company. The opposition document likely addresses arguments raised in the defendant's motion, which could pertain to procedural or substantive issues in the litigation. The court in which the case is pending is not specified.

• Filed

The case titled USA v. Rinderknecht, docket number 25-cr-00833, appears to be a criminal matter involving the United States government as the plaintiff. The available document is a scheduling notice, which typically outlines the timeline and procedural steps for the case but does not provide substantive details about the charges or facts. As such, the specific allegations against the defendant, Rinderknecht, and the nature of the criminal conduct remain undisclosed in the provided information. Without additional details, it is unclear what offenses are involved or the stage of the proceedings. Scheduling notices are routine in criminal cases to organize hearings, motions, and trial dates, ensuring orderly case management by the court.

• Filed

The case titled Organicgirl, LLC, docket number 26-cv-00369, involves a civil dispute currently before an unspecified court. The available document is a Case Management Statement, which typically outlines the parties' positions, procedural history, and plans for moving the case forward. Specific factual or legal details about the underlying dispute are not provided in the available information. As such, the nature of the claims, defenses, and parties involved remain unclear from the case management statement alone. Case management statements are procedural documents used to facilitate the court's oversight of case progression, including scheduling, discovery, and potential settlement discussions. This document suggests the case is in the early stages of litigation, focusing on organizing the procedural framework rather than substantive rulings or motions.

• Filed

In the case 3:25-cv-03020 Webseed, Inc. et al v. Department of State et al, Webseed, Inc. and associated plaintiffs have initiated litigation against the U.S. Department of State and other defendants. The case involves procedural motions, including a recent request for leave to file a document, indicating ongoing pretrial activity. Specific factual or legal claims are not detailed in the available information, but the involvement of a federal agency suggests potential issues related to administrative law or government regulation.

• Filed

In the case 3:26-cv-00105 Runnals v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al, the court addressed a motion to dismiss based on lack of jurisdiction. The plaintiff, Runnals, brought claims against PHH Mortgage Corporation and other defendants, but the court found that it did not have the proper jurisdiction to hear the case. As a result, the court dismissed the action, effectively ending the litigation in this forum. The dismissal underscores the importance of establishing jurisdiction before proceeding with substantive claims in federal court.

• Filed

In the case 3:25-cv-04570 Aretis Limited v. Oakever Games Pte. Ltd., the court issued an order on the report and recommendations related to the dispute between the parties. While specific factual details are limited, the order likely addresses procedural or substantive issues raised in prior filings or motions, guiding the next steps in the litigation. The case involves Aretis Limited bringing claims against Oakever Games Pte. Ltd., possibly concerning contractual or business disputes given the parties' corporate nature.

• Filed

[Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only] (<a href="https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/doc1/031147490046?caseid=1014914&amp;de_seq_num=37">10</a>)

• Filed

In the case of John Mark Embry v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al, the plaintiff, John Mark Embry, has brought a lawsuit against Experian and potentially other defendants. The case docket indicates an order referring the matter to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), suggesting the court's intent to encourage settlement discussions or mediation before proceeding further. The specific claims or allegations in the lawsuit are not detailed in the docket entry provided. This procedural step reflects the court's effort to manage the case efficiently and potentially resolve disputes without a full trial.

• Filed

In the case AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Cohen, docket number 25-cv-80503, the plaintiff AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. initiated legal proceedings against the defendant Cohen. The case involves a dispute likely centered around financial services or contractual obligations, given the nature of the plaintiff's business. Specific details of the claims or defenses are not provided in the available information. The court handling the case is not specified, and the procedural posture or outcome remains unclear based on the provided description.

• Filed

In the case titled Barberi v. JVL Dental Creations P.A. et al, docket number 1:26-cv-20885, the parties have filed a motion seeking an extension of time to file a response, reply, or answer. The case details and court are not specified, but the procedural motion indicates ongoing litigation requiring additional time for one party to meet court deadlines. This extension request is a common procedural step to ensure adequate preparation and response in civil litigation.

• Filed

The case titled Max Parker v. Paid to Think Inc., docket number 25-cv-10756, involves a civil dispute between the plaintiff, Max Parker, and the defendant, Paid to Think Inc. The available document pertains to a Joint Report under Rule 26(f), which outlines the parties' discovery plan and scheduling for the litigation process. This report is a procedural step required to facilitate the exchange of information and evidence between the parties as the case progresses. Specific factual or legal claims underlying the dispute are not detailed in the provided information.

• Filed

In the case 1:26-cv-20916 Dominguez v. Delices De France Inc et al, the parties have consented to jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge. This procedural development indicates that the parties agreed to have the magistrate judge oversee the case, which can streamline proceedings and potentially expedite resolution. The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Dominguez, and the defendant, Delices De France Inc, though specific factual or legal claims are not detailed in the available information.

• Filed

[Appeal Remark] (<a href="https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/doc1/031147490043?caseid=818318&amp;de_seq_num=1091">342</a>)

• Filed

In the case of Dau Duong v. Ariza, docket number 25-cv-02344, the court issued a judgment resolving the dispute between the parties. While specific details of the claims and defenses are not provided, the judgment indicates the conclusion of litigation on the merits or procedural grounds. The case likely involved civil claims given the nature of the docket and typical case titling conventions. The judgment document marks the final decision by the court, potentially including rulings on liability, damages, or other relief sought by the plaintiff Dau Duong against defendant Ariza.

• Filed

In the case of Jaime Cummings v. Uplight, Inc. et al, docket number 2:25-cv-05332, the plaintiff Jaime Cummings has initiated legal proceedings against Uplight, Inc. and other defendants. The case involves procedural matters related to setting or resetting hearings, as indicated by the recent docket entry. Specific substantive claims or allegations have not been detailed in the available information, leaving the precise nature of the dispute unclear. The case is currently active, with court scheduling and procedural management underway.

• Filed

Daniel Rave has initiated a civil lawsuit against OSI Systems, Inc., filing the complaint in federal court under docket number 26-cv-01350. The case is in its early stages, with the court issuing an initial order upon the filing of the complaint. Specific details regarding the nature of the claims or the underlying dispute have not been disclosed in the available information. As the case progresses, further documentation and court filings will provide more insight into the allegations and legal arguments presented by both parties.

• Filed

Attorney representing Grassroots America - We The People calls former Tyler librarian’s lawsuit ‘frivolous’ TYLER, Texas (KLTV) - After a former Tyler librarian filed a lawsuit against the City of Tyler, mayoral candidate Stuart Hene, and Grassroots America - We The People (GAWTP), the latter has issued a statement about the suit. The statement comes after Ashley Taylor, the former director of the Tyler Public Library, claims she was unlawfully retaliated against for a sign an employee posted in September. Hommel, the sign was posted by a staff member and said, “A truly great library has something in it to offend everyone.” The sign was posted without Taylor’s permission, according to the complaint filed in federal court. As a result of the sign’s placement, the plaintiff’s attorney stated, Taylor was given a choice of demotion or termination.

• Filed

QUINCY — A new charge will be presented to an Adams County grand jury in related to the February shooting death of Damien C. Wires, 34, previously pleaded not guilty to charges that detail allegations of her involvement with helping hide a suspect from arrest on Feb. Following inital investigations into the shooting, a warrant was issued for Stephen J. When law enforcement attempted to arrest Mosley that same afternoon, two other occupants of the North 11th Street home attempted to flee and were taken into custody.

• Filed

Casitas Holdings has initiated a civil lawsuit against an individual named Santarelli, filing the complaint in federal court under docket number 26-cv-00703. The case is in its early stages, as indicated by the issuance of an initial order upon filing of the complaint. Specific details regarding the nature of the dispute, claims, or relief sought have not been provided in the available information. The procedural posture suggests the case will proceed through the standard federal civil litigation process.