District of Columbia
The University of Washington Medical Center filed a notice of appearance in a civil case, docket 23-cv-01985, in the District of Columbia. This signals their participation in the litigation without disclosing dispute details.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
49393 cases tracked · 49393 currently active
Showing 20 of 49393 matching cases
District of Columbia
The University of Washington Medical Center filed a notice of appearance in a civil case, docket 23-cv-01985, in the District of Columbia. This signals their participation in the litigation without disclosing dispute details.
District of Columbia
A notice of attorney appearance was filed in Orozco et al v. City of San Juan Bautista et al, docket 24-cv-03332 in the District of Columbia. This reflects a change or addition of legal counsel in the case.
District of Delaware
In Carl Foust v. Zamroa et al, docket 25-cv-01055 in the District of Delaware, the court issued a report and recommendation. The document provides judicial analysis and proposed rulings on motions or case management matters.
District of Columbia
USA v. Silva et al, docket 10-cr-00256, is a criminal case in the District of Columbia currently at the jury trial stage. The case has moved past pretrial motions and is now being decided by a jury.
District of Delaware
The District of Delaware ordered a conference in Grifols, S.A. v. Yu et al, docket 24-cv-00576. The order addresses procedural management to coordinate scheduling or clarify issues before substantive motions or trial.
District of Delaware
In Starz Entertainment v. VL Collective, the District of Delaware court docket number 21-cv-01448, a notice was filed to remove co-counsel from the case. This procedural move may reflect strategic changes in legal representation or address conflicts of interest.
District of Delaware
The District of Delaware court issued an oral order responding to a procedural request in Mattco Industrial Products v. LTA Distributing, docket number 25-cv-00494. The order likely concerns case management or scheduling without addressing substantive claims.
District of Delaware
In Jackson v. Highridge Medical LLC, the District of Delaware court filed a clerical correction to the case docket, number 22-cv-00891. The correction addresses an administrative error without affecting substantive case issues or parties' positions.
District of Delaware
The District of Delaware court issued an order on a motion to take a deposition in Goddard v. Centurian Medical Dept., docket number 22-cv-00922. This procedural step allows one party to obtain sworn testimony from a witness before trial, which can be critical for case development.
District of Columbia
In Yoder v. Architect of the Capitol, the District of Columbia court extended the discovery deadline by 34 days. The civil case, docket number 23-cv-02214, involves a dispute with the Architect of the Capitol. The extension allows additional time for evidence gathering before trial preparation.
District of Columbia
Baalim filed a civil lawsuit against Busey Bank in the District of Columbia, docket number 24-cv-01314. The complaint and claims remain unspecified, limiting insight into the dispute's nature or stakes. The case is in early stages with minimal public details.
District of Columbia
In USA v. Taylor et al, an Assistant U.S. Attorney withdrew their appearance in this District of Columbia criminal case, docket number 25-cr-00166. This change may reflect a shift in prosecution strategy or personnel. The case details and charges remain unspecified in the summary.
District of Columbia
In Pappas v. Metropolitan Police Department, the District of Columbia criminal court received a procedural notice outlining upcoming steps in the litigation. The case involves criminal charges against the Metropolitan Police Department, with docket number 19-cv-02800. The notice likely addresses scheduling or
District of Colorado
Densys Ltd. filed a civil suit against Medit Corp. in the District of Colorado, docketed as 25-cv-00769. The parties or court have requested oral argument, signaling that judicial review of specific motions or issues will occur beyond written briefs. This step may influence the court's rulings on contested matters.
District of Colorado
Colvin v. Tunnage has moved to the appellate phase after a notice of appeal was filed in the District of Colorado. This procedural step transfers the case from the trial court to the United States Court of Appeals for review of the lower court's decision. The docket number is 25-cv-03239.
District of Colorado
An order was issued on a motion to restrict in Peddada v. Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado. The procedural development affects litigation scope and may impact case strategy.
District of Colorado
The District of Colorado granted leave to restrict in McKim v. International Paper Company. The order limits discovery or procedural scope, affecting evidence gathering and case presentation.
Southern District of Florida
Cole v. Lucas is a civil case in the Southern District of Florida with no detailed summary available. The dispute involves the named parties but lacks disclosed claims or issues at this stage.
Southern District of Florida
The Southern District of Florida selected a mediator for a sealed case involving unauthorized electronic nicotine delivery products. The mediation aims to resolve the dispute outside of trial.
Southern District of Florida
Brownell v. JSD Fund II was removed from Florida state court to the Southern District of Florida federal court. The removal transfers jurisdiction and may affect procedural posture and strategy.