Western District of Washington
Compass Inc. filed a notice of appearance in case 25-cv-00766 pending in the Western District of Washington. This filing signals Compass Inc.'s formal participation in the litigation involving multiple parties.
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
49274 cases tracked · 49245 currently active
Showing 20 of 49274 matching cases
Western District of Washington
Compass Inc. filed a notice of appearance in case 25-cv-00766 pending in the Western District of Washington. This filing signals Compass Inc.'s formal participation in the litigation involving multiple parties.
Northern District of Illinois
The United States obtained a judgment for revocation against Henry et al in criminal case 12-cr-50066 before the Northern District of Illinois. The court revoked the defendants' status or privileges as part of the criminal proceedings.
Northern District of Illinois
The Northern District of Illinois allowed a supplemental filing in Martin v. Peterson multidistrict litigation, docket 25-cv-13670. This permission enables parties to submit additional documents relevant to the ongoing coordinated proceedings.
Northern District of Illinois
The court granted a motion to amend the complaint in Carr v. Cook County multidistrict litigation, docket 17-cv-07135, in the Northern District of Illinois. The amendment addresses procedural or substantive issues in the complaint within this coordinated litigation.
Northern District of Illinois
Calhoun filed a Bill of Costs against the City of Chicago in case 22-cv-04579 before the Northern District of Illinois. This filing seeks recovery of litigation expenses following the conclusion of proceedings.
Northern District of Illinois
In Fernandez v. City of Peekskill, docket 25-cv-04417, the defendant obtained an extension to respond to the complaint in the Northern District of Illinois. This extension allows additional time to prepare a defense or gather information before answering.
Northern District of Illinois
The Northern District of Illinois issued a judgment on the pleadings in Lee v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, docket 25-cv-12070. The court resolved the case based solely on pleadings, indicating one party's claims lacked sufficient support to proceed to trial.
Northern District of Illinois
The Northern District of Illinois set deadlines in the civil litigation Bernardino Flores v. Cesilia Bracamontes, docket 26-cv-02507. These deadlines establish clear timelines for procedural steps to ensure efficient case progression and clarify party responsibilities.
Northern District of California
The United States government filed a motion to detain defendant Ruiz without bail in case 24-cr-00181 before the Northern District of California. The government seeks to restrict Ruiz's liberty pending further proceedings, citing concerns that justify detention.
Northern District of California
The court issued an order on a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in Johnson v. Sanford. This order addresses the plaintiff's request to proceed without paying court fees due to financial hardship. The ruling determines whether the case can continue under reduced cost conditions.
Northern District of California
Sheet Metal Workers Pension Trust filed an additional writ against THP Mechanical, LLC in the Northern District of California. This filing indicates multiple legal claims or strategies pursued simultaneously in the same case. The trust appears to be intensifying its litigation efforts.
Northern District of California
Rich v. Mazhar was filed in the Northern District of California with no further details available. The case is at an initial stage with no substantive information disclosed. Litigation status and issues remain unclear.
Northern District of California
Van Wagner v. Sommeliers advanced with the filing of a stipulation and order in the Northern District of California. The parties reached a procedural or substantive agreement, formalized by the court's order. This development may streamline litigation or resolve specific issues between the parties.
Northern District of California
Following a subpoena to Lyfe Capital, the court filed a transcript order in an ongoing civil case. This procedural step ensures that evidence obtained via subpoena is properly documented and available for litigation purposes. The order supports the evidentiary process in the case.
Northern District of California
Chesapeake International seeks a Digital Millennium Copyright Act subpoena against Roblox Corporation in the Northern District of California. The dispute centers on alleged misuse of copyrighted material and involves complex copyright and digital rights issues. The subpoena aims to obtain evidence relevant to the
Northern District of California
Apple Inc. filed a lawsuit against Shi et al., but the summons was returned unexecuted after 16 days. This failure to serve defendants properly raises procedural hurdles for Apple and may delay or jeopardize the case's progress. Service of process remains a critical issue.
Northern District of California
Webb v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. commenced in the Northern District of California with the issuance of a summons. The case is at an early procedural stage with no substantive developments reported. Litigation has formally begun but remains nascent.
Northern District of California
The court struck improperly filed electronic documents in Daniels v. Nichols to enforce compliance with electronic filing rules. The ruling maintains the integrity of the court record by rejecting submissions that violate procedural requirements. This action shows the court's strict adherence to filing protocols.
Northern District of California
The Northern District of California issued a stay order in Bassett v. Castellanos, pausing all proceedings. The court likely aims to manage case flow or address pending motions or settlement talks, though the docket does not specify the exact reason for the stay. This pause halts any further litigation activity until
Northern District of California
Prudential Insurance Company of America participated in a Zoom teleconference in its civil lawsuit against Aumentado in the Northern District of California. The teleconference reflects ongoing case management or discovery discussions.