Browse Cases

Southern District of Florida

Gautam filed a case against the City of Sunrise, Florida, and others in the Southern District of Florida, docket 25-cv-60841. The court recently considered a motion for summary judgment.

Southern District of Florida

Burgess v. Uruski et al reopened in the Southern District of Florida under docket 25-cv-80836. The reopening suggests renewed activity or developments requiring court attention.

Southern District of Florida

Rey-Pena filed a civil case against Luemme LLC in the Southern District of Florida, docket 25-cv-26044. The case was referred to mediation to explore settlement options.

Southern District of New York

USA v. Baker is a criminal case in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cr-00387. Recent activity includes termination of motions, indicating progression toward resolution.

The Estate of Richard Leon Meankins is involved in litigation against the State of Texas. The court recently issued an opinion on the matter, indicating ongoing judicial review.

Anthony Joseph Hernandez filed a civil case against the State of Texas. The case remains active, with a recent opinion issued by the court addressing substantive issues in the dispute.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey scheduled a hearing in Rodriguez v. Floor & Decor Incorporated, docket number 25-cv-17190. The hearing will address contested issues requiring judicial resolution.

Central District of California

Gomez filed a summons request in the Central District of California, docket number 26-cv-04958. This procedural step initiates service of process on defendants in the case, moving the litigation forward.

Northern District of California

LP Insurance Services, LLC filed a suggestion of death in the Northern District of California, docket number 25-cv-03991. This filing notifies the court of a party's death, potentially affecting case management and requiring substitution of parties.

Northern District of California

Shah and Fandom, Inc. reached a settlement in the Northern District of California, docket number 24-cv-01062. The settlement ends the dispute, likely involving intellectual property or contract claims, without further court proceedings.

Western District of Washington

The Western District of Washington entered judgment disposing of counts in USA v. Fultz, docket number 26-po-05472. The case reached a resolution on one or more charges, but no documents detail the judgment or sentencing.

The court issued a notice of error regarding a filing by Meghan Messenger. The error involved the use of an incorrect format—a letter—where correspondence is not permitted under local criminal rule LCrR 49(f)(4). The party was instructed to refile the document in the proper format.

Central District of California

In Gierlich-Mitchell v. Brentwood Industries, Inc. et al, Central District of California, docket 25-cv-00272, the plaintiff seeks to compel answers to interrogatories. This discovery dispute involves obtaining sworn written responses to questions critical for case preparation. The court's ruling on the motion will

Central District of California

Ford Motor Company initiated a case against Knight Law Group LLP and others in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-04550. The filing marks the formal start of litigation and notifies the court of the claims. This procedural step triggers the defendant's obligation to respond within the court's deadlines.

Northern District of California

Meta Platforms, Inc. filed an answer to the complaint in Northern District of California case Judang Team LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc., docket 25-cv-05156. The answer responds to allegations and asserts defenses. This step moves the case into the active litigation phase, setting the stage for discovery and further

Central District of California

Plaintiff Nader Filsoof filed an amended complaint in Filsoof v. Coordinated Properties, Inc. et al in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-10823. The amendment modifies the original claims or procedural posture, possibly to clarify allegations or incorporate new facts. Amended complaints are common and

Central District of California

A status conference was held in Matyas et al v. Summerkids, Inc. et al in the Central District of California, docket 21-cv-04163. The conference allowed the court to review case progress and address procedural or substantive issues. It serves to keep the litigation on track and resolve disputes that might delay

Central District of California

Zions Bancorporation, N.A. filed a notice in its case against Dennis Uniform MFG. LLC in the Central District of California, docket 24-cv-09238. The notice informs the court and opposing parties of a development in the litigation. Such filings maintain transparency and ensure all parties stay informed of procedural or

Central District of California

In USA v. Omidi et al, a criminal case in the Central District of California, docket 17-cr-00661, hearings were set and reset. These scheduling adjustments ensure all parties are prepared and the court can manage its docket efficiently. The changes reflect ongoing case management rather than substantive rulings.

Northern District of Illinois

The court granted an extension of time in Huckleby v. Stewart et al, Northern District of Illinois, docket 25-cv-06469. This extension allows the plaintiff additional time to prepare the case or gather evidence. The court showed flexibility to accommodate the plaintiff's needs, potentially affecting the litigation