Browse Cases

Southern District of Florida

In the case 1:25-cv-25749 Stumfold v. WMB MG 110 LLC et al, the court issued an Order to Show Cause, which typically requires a party to appear and explain or justify why a certain action should or should not be taken. The specific details of the dispute and the underlying claims are not provided, but the involvement

Southern District of Florida

The case titled Harty v. Orange Ave Hospitality LLC, docket number 25-cv-62589, involves a civil dispute between the plaintiff, Harty, and the defendant, Orange Ave Hospitality LLC. The available document is a Notice of Attorney Appearance, indicating that legal counsel has formally entered the case on behalf of one

Southern District of Florida

In the case 1:26-cv-22584 Reyes Cortes v. Miami Federal Detention Center et al, the petitioner, Reyes Cortes, filed a complaint seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The petition challenges the legality of the petitioner’s detention at the Miami Federal Detention Center. Habeas corpus petitions typically assert that the

Southern District of Florida

The case titled Box v. Broward County, Florida et al, docket number 24-cv-61734, is currently in the early stages of litigation. The parties have submitted a Scheduling Report pursuant to Rule 26(f) and Local Rule 16.1, which outlines the proposed timeline for discovery and other pretrial activities. Specific details

Southern District of Florida

The case 1:25-cv-22498 Martin v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Martin, and the defendant, Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. While specific facts of the case are not detailed, the docket entry references a Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement

Southern District of Florida

In the case titled Dela Cruz Thompson v. Kaplan North America, LLC, docket number 26-cv-60891, the plaintiff initiated legal proceedings against Kaplan North America, LLC. The case record includes a summons affidavit that has been returned executed, indicating that the defendant has been formally served with the

District of Columbia

Media Matters for America and others filed suit against Paxton in the District of Columbia, docket 24-cv-00147. A recent notice of appearance indicates new counsel or party appearances. The case likely involves media, political, or First Amendment issues given the parties involved.

District of Columbia

Salazar and others sued the District of Columbia and additional defendants in a longstanding civil case, docket 93-cv-00452. The docket shows a notice filing, reflecting procedural or administrative developments in this complex litigation that has persisted for years.

District of Columbia

ACK FOR WHALES, INC. and others continue litigation against the U.S. Department of Commerce in the District of Columbia, docket 25-cv-01678. The docket reflects scheduling or hearing resets, indicating ongoing procedural activity in this likely administrative or regulatory dispute.

District of Colorado

The District of Colorado court issued an order staying Mohamed v. Society for Human Resource Management, docket 22-cv-01625. The stay halts proceedings temporarily, possibly pending related litigation or arbitration. This procedural pause affects the timeline and momentum of the civil dispute.

District of Colorado

In the District of Colorado, Payne filed a motion to quash against the Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General, docket 25-mc-00068. The court issued an order addressing the motion, which challenges the legal validity or scope of a subpoena or similar process.

Central District of California

Michael Grecco Productions Inc. filed suit against Twitter, Inc. and others in the Central District of California, docket 24-cv-04878. The docket shows a scheduling notice, marking the case's early procedural phase. The nature of the dispute likely involves intellectual property or media-related claims.

Central District of California

David Katzman and others sued Lloyds Syndicates 2623/623 and additional parties in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-11333. The court issued an Order to Show Cause, requiring parties to justify certain actions or responses, signaling active judicial management and possible compliance or procedural

Central District of California

Irene Gonzalez sued Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc. and others in the Central District of California, docket 23-cv-01866. The case is at an early stage with a scheduling notice issued to organize case management and discovery. The specific claims against the appliance company are not detailed in the docket.

Central District of California

Marilyn Gladle filed a civil suit against the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and other defendants in the Central District of California, docket 15-cv-00057. The docket notes returned mail, suggesting possible service or communication problems. The case likely involves administrative or veterans benefits claims

Central District of California

The Central District of California scheduled the initial pretrial conference in PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Martin, Jr. et al, docket number 25-cv-10616. This step sets the framework for case management, discovery, and scheduling in this civil mortgage-related dispute. The underlying claims remain unspecified in the

District of New Jersey

The case titled 1:19-md-02875 VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION involves multidistrict litigation concerning alleged product liability claims related to the blood pressure medications valsartan, losartan, and irbesartan. Plaintiffs in this litigation assert that these medications were

District of New Jersey

In the case 2:19-cv-06819 UNITED WINDOW & DOOR MFG., INC. v. DECEUNINCK NORTH AMERICA LLC, the plaintiff, United Window & Door Manufacturing, Inc., initiated litigation against Deceuninck North America LLC. The case involves procedural matters related to setting or resetting hearings, indicating ongoing scheduling or

District of New Jersey

In the case Johnson v. Mogan et al, docket number 19-cv-19167, the plaintiff Johnson initiated legal action against defendants including Mogan. The case details and court are unspecified, and the available document is a text order without further substantive information. Due to the limited information, the precise

District of New Jersey

In the case 3:25-cv-19077 SM Medical Holdings Corporation, as assignee of NR Pennsylvania Associates, LLC, filed a lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee. The dispute likely involved contractual or payment issues related to healthcare services, given the parties involved. The case concluded with a