Browse Cases

Central District of California

California River Watch initiated litigation against Daggett Community Services District in the Central District of California, docket number 24-cv-00727. The recent docket entry is a notice of lodging documents, likely evidence or filings related to environmental or regulatory issues involving the defendant.

Central District of California

Denison Powerlifting Inc. sued John Dorsey and others in the Central District of California, docket number 23-cv-00744. A recent docket entry records a notice of appearance or withdrawal of counsel, indicating a change in legal representation for one or more parties.

Central District of California

Josh Webber filed suit against The Dash Group LLC and others in the Central District of California, docket number 25-cv-12104. The court issued a scheduling notice setting deadlines and timelines, indicating the case is in the pretrial phase with procedural matters being organized.

Central District of California

Wadi Venture, LLC sued the United States of America in the Central District of California, docket number 25-cv-06568. The court dismissed the case, terminating proceedings without trial or further litigation. The basis for dismissal is not provided.

Central District of California

The Central District of California dismissed the civil case Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Ripps et al., docket number 22-cv-04355. The dismissal ends the litigation at this stage, either through procedural or substantive grounds. The reasons for dismissal were not disclosed.

Central District of California

The United States of America filed suit against Judy Azar and others in the Central District of California, docket number 20-cv-02538. The case likely involves federal claims, but no further details on the nature of allegations or procedural posture are available.

Central District of California

Cheryl Ann Castro sued Martin O'Malley in the Central District of California, docket number 23-cv-02525. The latest docket entry concerns a motion related to attorney fees, indicating disputes over legal cost allocation. The case’s substantive issues remain unspecified.

Southern District of New York

The court in Junious v. W. Baker et al., Southern District of New York, docket number 22-cv-03681, set or reset deadlines and hearings. This reflects ongoing procedural management to accommodate case developments and maintain orderly progress in litigation.

Southern District of New York

In Washington v. Unifin, Inc., Southern District of New York, docket number 25-cv-07689, the court terminated hearings as the latest procedural update. This suggests a pause or possible conclusion in litigation activities, though the underlying dispute and claims remain unspecified.

Southern District of New York

Brady Laplante filed a civil suit against Leafguard Holdings, Inc. in the Southern District of New York, docket number 26-cv-03078. The court recorded that the summons and complaint were served and returned within 21 days, confirming formal notification to the defendant. The case is in its early stages with no further

District of Delaware

This is a duplicate entry of Hartmann v. Carroll et al with no additional information provided. The case details remain unavailable.

District of Delaware

Ritter v. Burke et al involves a notice of other procedural matters, indicating administrative or procedural activity in the case. Without further details, the nature of the dispute is unclear, but it involves multiple defendants.

District of Delaware

This case is a duplicate filing of Dan Dee International, LLC et al v. Global New Ventures Group LC et al, docket 23-cv-01274. It similarly reflects a court order with the notation ' SO ORDERED ,' indicating judicial approval of a procedural matter. No additional substantive information is available beyond the

District of Delaware

Innospec, Inc. and related parties have initiated litigation against Aurorium Holdings, LLC and others under docket 24-cv-01371. No substantive case details or summaries are currently available, indicating the matter is either newly filed or under seal. The nature of the dispute remains unspecified, but the

District of New Jersey

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and others have filed a civil lawsuit against E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company and other defendants under docket number 19-cv-14766. The case likely involves environmental claims related to alleged violations or damages caused by the defendants' activities.

District of Delaware

This case, also titled Fatir v. Johns with docket number 23-cv-00370, appears to be a duplicate or related filing to case 3349. It involves the same parties and lacks additional details regarding the nature of the dispute or procedural posture.

District of Delaware

This case is a duplicate entry of Caporale et al v. EIDP, Inc. et al, docket number 19-cv-01672. The latest docket entry is a notice of service, indicating procedural activity related to document exchange between parties. No additional substantive information is provided.

District of Delaware

This entry duplicates case 3341 involving The Select Group Holding Company, LLC v. BH Zenith, Inc. et al, with a motion to dismiss or similar dispositive motion pending. The procedural posture remains focused on potential early resolution.

District of Delaware

This entry duplicates case 3339, involving Jean-Philippe v. Perlman et al, with the filing of a reply brief. The procedural posture remains the same, focusing on continued briefing and argumentation in the case.

District of New Jersey

Indigitech, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against First Data Merchant Services, LLC and others. The recent docket entry shows a motion for an attorney to appear pro hac vice, allowing out-of-state counsel to participate in the case. This procedural step facilitates legal representation and may impact case strategy.