Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York transmitted an appellate mandate in Amay v. Royce, signaling that the appeals court issued a decision now implemented at the trial level. This step closes the appellate phase.

Southern District of New York

Excel Urgent Care PLLC v. Solv Health Inc. saw a conference adjournment in the Southern District of New York. This procedural adjustment may reflect ongoing negotiations or preparation for substantive hearings.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York issued a scheduling order in Studs, Inc. v. Levco Limited Company et al to organize pretrial deadlines. This procedural step structures discovery and motion practice.

Southern District of New York

Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. Blade Contracting, Inc. remains active in the Southern District of New York without recent public docket updates. The case status suggests ongoing but low-profile litigation.

Southern District of New York

A telephone conference occurred in Palacios v. KHRG 851 LLC in the Southern District of New York to discuss case management or settlement. Specific claims or issues remain undisclosed.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York issued a scheduling order in Armstrong et al v. Elizabeth et al to set deadlines for discovery, motions, and trial. This step advances the case toward resolution.

Southern District of New York

Missed Call, LLC sued CloudTalk.io, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging business-related claims. Recent procedural activity suggests ongoing case development but details on claims remain unspecified.

District of New Jersey

In Weiss v. Posner et al, a motion brief was filed in the District of New Jersey, signaling active litigation. The motion could affect the case's trajectory through dismissal or summary judgment rulings.

Western District of Washington

The Western District of Washington set deadlines and hearings in McSweeney v. Cohen to manage the case's timeline. These scheduling orders aim to ensure the case proceeds efficiently toward trial or dispositive motions.

District of New Jersey

This case is a duplicate filing of Caldwell v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al, reflecting the same parties and docket number. The procedural posture remains at the notice of appearance stage, indicating initial case development.

District of New Jersey

This is a duplicate entry of Tipan Mendoza v. Silver Tree Commercial Real Estate Co. Inc. et al, docket number 23-cv-03214. It involves the same parties and procedural posture as case 4300, with hearings set as part of the litigation process.

District of New Jersey

This case is a duplicate filing of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Aroma'z Home Improvement Inc. et al, docket number 25-cv-12756. It involves the same parties and likely the same issues as case 4298, concerning insurance and liability matters.

District of Massachusetts

This civil case involves Backo filing suit against GrayBella Capital. The recent docket entry notes mail returned, indicating possible issues with service of process or communication between parties. Such procedural challenges can delay litigation and affect case progress. The nature of the dispute is not detailed

District of Massachusetts

This criminal case involves the United States versus Petrova, with recent proceedings focusing on a motion to modify the defendant's conditions of release. The court issued an order addressing this motion, which likely pertains to adjustments in pretrial restrictions or supervision terms imposed on the defendant.

District of New Jersey

This entry duplicates the case Xin Yang International Import & Export (Guangzhou) Co. Ltd. v. Azad International Inc. under docket 23-cv-20418, reflecting the same 60-day administrative termination order. It confirms the temporary suspension of the case.

District of New Jersey

This entry duplicates the case Kidd v. Mooney with docket 25-cv-04527 and reflects the same order of dismissal. It confirms that the case has been closed by the court's order.

District of New Jersey

The case Greenfeld v. Kluger et al involves a civil dispute filed under docket number 24-cv-09025. Specific details about the parties' claims or the nature of the dispute are not provided. The case is currently pending in an unspecified court.

District of Massachusetts

Whoop, Inc. initiated legal action against Serinity Group, Inc., as reflected by the notice of service of process. This document confirms that the defendant has been formally served with the complaint, marking the commencement of their obligation to respond within the legal timeframe.

District of New Jersey

In the case of Disantis v. Rudd, the parties have submitted a stipulation and order, indicating a procedural agreement or resolution on a particular matter within the litigation. The details of the stipulation are not provided, but such orders often relate to case management or discovery issues.

District of New Jersey

This entry duplicates the case of Norwalt Design, Inc. v. Integrity Industrial Inkjet Integration, Inc., docket 25-cv-14097, involving a request for the clerk's entry of default. The procedural posture and implications remain the same as previously described. No additional information is provided, confirming the