Browse Cases

Northern District of California

This entry duplicates the case The Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai, Inc. et al, referencing the joint case management statement. It reflects ongoing procedural coordination between the parties. The substantive matters remain consistent with the related case entry.

Northern District of California

This entry duplicates the case Kelly v. Governor Newsom et al, involving a Prison Trust Fund Account Statement. The repetition suggests ongoing administrative processing related to the plaintiff's financial disclosures. The substantive issues likely mirror those in the related case entry.

District of New Jersey

This case, Grover v. Knipp et al, involves initial procedural steps as indicated by the scheduling conference order. The court is organizing the timeline and logistics for the case to proceed efficiently. Details about the underlying dispute are not provided, but the scheduling order marks the commencement of active

Northern District of California

In Jana v. Walmart, Inc., the parties have submitted a reply to an opposition or response, indicating ongoing litigation likely involving a dispute between an individual plaintiff and a large retail corporation. The case docket number 24-cv-00698 suggests a civil matter, though specific claims or issues are not

District of New Jersey

This entry duplicates the case Atlas Data Privacy Corporation et al v. Amerilist, Inc. et al, docket number 24-cv-05775, with no additional information available. The case remains without substantive public details or filings. No further analysis can be provided beyond the initial entry due to the absence of case

District of Columbia

The Estate of Yigal Wachs filed a civil lawsuit against the Syrian Arab Republic, seeking redress for claims presumably related to wrongful acts or damages attributed to the defendant state. The case involves international legal considerations, including service of process across foreign jurisdictions, as indicated by

District of Columbia

This case involves plaintiffs B.D. et al. against the District of Columbia. The docket indicates procedural activity related to appearances pro hac vice, suggesting involvement of out-of-state counsel. Specific substantive issues or claims are not detailed in the available summary.

Northern District of California

This case involves Alice Rosenblum as the plaintiff against Passes, Inc. and other defendants. The docket indicates procedural activity related to transcript orders, suggesting ongoing litigation but lacking substantive details on the claims or defenses involved. The nature of the dispute and the court's jurisdiction

Southern District of Florida

Lewter v. Northfield Holdings Corp Florida was dismissed and closed by court order. The court ended the case, possibly due to settlement, procedural issues, or merits ruling. No further details on the grounds or claims are available.

Southern District of Florida

Fly All Ways N.V. v. Northern Air Cargo LLC was dismissed for failure to state a claim. The court found the plaintiff's complaint insufficient to proceed, effectively ending the case unless amended. This dismissal is a substantive ruling on the pleadings.

Southern District of Florida

Prince v. City of Coral Springs Florida initiated litigation with summons issued and electronic case filing completed. The case is at its inception, targeting the city and other defendants. No substantive claims or defenses have been disclosed.

Southern District of Florida

Howarth v. Ross Brothers LLC shows procedural filings such as certificates of service, indicating compliance with court notification rules. The case appears to be in early or mid-litigation stages with no substantive developments reported.

Southern District of Florida

Spencer v. Revance Therapeutics Inc. was dismissed and closed by court order. The litigation concluded without disclosed reasons for dismissal. The case record does not provide information on the nature of the dispute or grounds for termination.

Southern District of Florida

Pou v. Beis LLC was dismissed and closed by court order in the Southern District of Florida. The dismissal terminates the case, though the record does not specify whether it was with or without prejudice or the reasons. No substantive facts or claims were provided.

Southern District of Florida

Oropesa v. XpresSpa Holdings LLC was voluntarily dismissed by stipulation of the parties. The dismissal indicates resolution without trial or further litigation. No details about the underlying claims or settlement were disclosed.

Southern District of Florida

Eddy v. South University of Florida-Member LLC is progressing with adjustments to procedural deadlines. The court has set or reset response deadlines, indicating active case management. No substantive claims or defenses have been detailed publicly.

Southern District of Florida

Proveyer v. Salumeria 104 Delray LLC settled the dispute, ending litigation in the Southern District of Florida. The settlement terms remain confidential, and no further court action is expected. The case is closed following the notice of settlement filed by counsel.

Southern District of Florida

The Southern District of Florida reassigned Perez v. Kaplan North America LLC to a new judge or venue. This procedural change affects case management and scheduling but does not alter the substantive issues of the dispute. The case remains active under the new assignment.

Northern District of California

This case is identical in title and docket to case 5511, involving Volvo Penta of the Americas, LLC and Boater's Insurance Agency, Inc. The current docket entry also concerns an order on a motion for pro hac vice admission. No further substantive information is provided.

Northern District of California

This civil case, identical in parties and docket to case 5506, also reports certification of an ADR session. The duplication indicates concurrent or related proceedings involving Little Seeds Children's Center, Inc. and Citibank, N.A., focusing on dispute resolution efforts. The emphasis on ADR certification